Doug LaMalfa

Doug LaMalfa supports a free-market economic approach, emphasizing tax cuts and reducing regulations to stimulate economic growth. He often advocates for policies that benefit small businesses and traditional industries.

Representing a rural district, Doug LaMalfa is a strong proponent of agricultural interests, advocating for policies that support farmers and oppose regulations he views as burdensome to the agricultural sector.

Doug LaMalfa supports strict immigration controls, including stronger border security and enforcement of existing immigration laws. He often opposes amnesty and emphasizes the need for a merit-based immigration system.

Doug LaMalfa favors local control of education and supports policies that allow for school choice, including charter schools and voucher programs, often opposing federal overreach in education.

Doug LaMalfa supports an all-of-the-above energy policy, promoting fossil fuel development along with renewable energy sources. He tends to prioritize energy independence and economic growth.

Doug LaMalfa is skeptical of aggressive climate change policies that he believes could harm the economy. He often emphasizes adaptation and technological solutions over regulatory mandates.

Doug LaMalfa opposes the Affordable Care Act and supports healthcare reforms that promote competition and reduce government involvement in the healthcare sector.

Doug LaMalfa focuses on reducing government regulation in the housing market to encourage development and address affordability issues through market-driven solutions.

Doug LaMalfa supports infrastructure improvements focusing on efficiency and cost-effectiveness, often advocating for federal investment in rural transportation projects.

Doug LaMalfa advocates for improving veterans' access to healthcare and benefits, emphasizing the need to streamline VA processes and increase funding for veteran services.

Doug LaMalfa supports voter ID laws and measures to enhance election security, often opposing federal legislation that he views as expanding voting without adequate protections.